The Semantic Structure in the Text "I Am the Presence" by Poet Amal Saleh

July 24, 2026 - 00:16 | Last updated July 24, 2026 - 00:16

Amal Saleh

Amir Ahmed

--:--

Follow Okaz channel on WhatsApp

Ahmed Amir - Iraq

The text "I Am the Presence" by poet Amal Saleh, published in the newspaper "Okaz," presents a dense poetic structure based on the dialectic of presence and absence, voice and echo, and authenticity and repetition. It is a text that reexamines the concept of the "self" within language and transforms presence from an existential certainty into a semantic battle against fading, replication, and expressive coldness.

From the very first moment, the self is established through negation. I am not like the echo; the self does not define itself by what it is, but by what it refuses to be. Here, one of the most important mechanisms of the deep structure in the text is revealed, as the "echo" transforms into an opposing semantic center that allows presence to take shape.

According to the structuralist vision, meaning is not a fixed essence within words, but the result of the relationships existing between them. Therefore, "presence" cannot be understood except through its opposite; "the echo." The echo is not an independent sound, but a dependent trace.

Here, the text acquires a critical dimension, as it appears to be a protest against consumed language and discourses that have lost their uniqueness and turned into repeated voices within the cultural space.

Moreover, the coupling of the echo with:

"fades with the beats of time"

reveals the fragility of this existence. The echo is doomed to perish because it does not possess its own center, but lives as a reflection of another.

The text relies on a clear repetitive structure, represented in the repetition of:

"I"

"the echo"

"the cold words"

"madness"

This repetition does not merely serve a rhythmic function, but constitutes a mechanism for producing meaning and connecting the parts of the text within a cohesive network.

The repetition of "I" establishes the centrality of the self, yet at the same time reveals its existential anxiety, because a self that insists on constantly declaring itself appears as though it fears fading away.

As for "the cold words," they transform into a semantic field indicating:

stagnation,

the extinguishment of feeling,

the loss of the warmth of experience,

the death of language.

Thus, coldness becomes a metaphor for discourse devoid of life.

Consequently, the dividing line between "presence" and "the echo" collapses, because presence itself is only achieved through a repeated linguistic rebound.

Furthermore, the sentence:

"I am the voice that resembles me"

carries a profound deconstructive contradiction, because the voice within language is not absolutely pure or original, but rather a trace of previous voices within the linguistic and cultural system.

Here, "presence" itself becomes deferred, as the self cannot attain complete correspondence with its voice, because language always precedes the speaker and imposes its systems and references upon them.

"And madness is I" does not portray madness as a collapse or loss of consciousness, but transforms it into a source of creation and ordering: "I arrange the madness of words." Here the paradox occurs; madness produces order, while "rational words" appear cold and rigid.

The text forms a modern poetic structure in which philosophical vision intersects with the linguistic system and semiotic significance. The binaries, repetitions, and shifts make presence a problematic concept shaped through the negation of the other, resistance to fading, opposition, and semantic relations, carrying its internal contradictions so that presence turns into a linguistic trace that is only completed through what it negates. Thus, it becomes a profound philosophical inquiry into the relationship of the self with language and the crisis of authenticity in a world overflowing with replicated voices and cold words.

The text "I Am the Presence" by poet Amal Saleh, published in the newspaper "Okaz," presents a dense poetic structure based on the dialectic of presence and absence, voice and echo, authenticity and repetition. It is a text that reexamines the concept of "self" within language and transforms presence from existential certainty into a semantic battle against fading, replication, and expressive coldness.

From the very first moment, the self is established through negation. I am not like the echo; the self does not define itself by what it is, but by what it refuses to be. Here, one of the most important mechanisms of the deep structure in the text is revealed, as "the echo" transforms into an opposing semantic center that allows presence to take shape.

According to structuralist thought, meaning is not a fixed essence within words, but a result of the relationships existing between them. Therefore, "presence" cannot be understood except through its opposite; "the echo." The echo is not an independent sound, but a dependent trace.

Here, the text acquires a critical dimension, as it appears to protest against the consumed language and the discourses that have lost their uniqueness and turned into repeated voices within the cultural space.

Moreover, the coupling of the echo with:

“fades with the beats of time”

reveals the fragility of this existence, for the echo is doomed to perish because it does not possess its own center; it exists as a rebound of others.

The text relies on a clear repetitive structure, manifested in the repetition of:

“I”

“the echo”

“the cold words”

“madness”

This repetition serves not only a rhythmic function but also forms a mechanism for producing meaning and linking parts of the text within a cohesive network.

The repetition of “I” establishes the centrality of the self, but at the same time reveals its existential anxiety, as the self that insists on constantly declaring itself seems to fear fading away.

As for “the cold words,” they transform into a semantic field indicating:

stagnation,

extinguishing of feeling,

loss of the warmth of experience,

death of language.

Thus, coldness becomes a metaphor for discourse devoid of life.

In this way, the boundary between “presence” and “the echo” collapses, as presence itself is only realized through a repeated linguistic rebound.

Furthermore, the sentence:

“I am the voice that resembles me”

carries a profound deconstructive contradiction, as the voice within language is not pure or absolutely original, but rather a trace of previous voices within the linguistic and cultural system.

Here, “presence” itself becomes deferred, as the self cannot achieve complete alignment with its voice, because language always precedes the speaker and imposes its systems and references upon them.

“And madness is I” does not present madness as a collapse or loss of consciousness, but transforms it into a source of creation and order: “I arrange the madness of words,” and here the paradox occurs; madness produces order, while “the rational words” seem cold and rigid.