Saleh Issa

What Artificial Intelligence Cannot Replicate: Artistic Sensation

July 6, 2026 - 00:07 | Last update July 6, 2026 - 00:07

--:--

Follow Okaz channel on WhatsApp

Sound is raw material, while singing is a complete personality. Between each letter and each letter, and between each breath and each breath, lives that feeling which is not produced by algorithms nor preserved by databases. Here lies the difference between imitation and creativity, and between simulation and presence.

Today, we can listen to a song by Talal Maddah performed by artificial intelligence in the voice of Mohammed Abdu, or to a work in the voice of Talal Maddah for the songs of Mohammed Abdu, but the expert ear will quickly discover that something essential is missing; that thing is not the tone, but the way the musical phrase is constructed, the breathing points, the intensity of emotion, the ability to mold the words, and the time the artist gives to each letter before moving on to the next one.

Deepfakes have invaded art just as they have invaded politics and media, and they have become capable of producing works that seem real at first glance, but they cannot replicate the human experience that created the artist. Singing schools are not built solely on vocal ranges, but on years of accumulation, taste, culture, experience, and genuine emotion in response to the text and melody.

Therefore, the future of art will not be a battle between man and machine, but between authenticity and imitation. Technology may succeed in borrowing voices, but it fails to borrow the soul. It may replicate vibrations, but it cannot replicate the feeling that allows the listener to distinguish the artist from the very first word, even if the melody changes.

The true artist leaves a mark in every work that cannot be measured by sound frequencies, but by artistic identity. That identity will remain the most resilient mark against the chaos of artificial intelligence, as it stems from a human who lived the experience before singing it, while the machine knows only how to rearrange what has already been created by humans.

Sound is raw material, while singing is a complete personality. Between each letter and each letter, and between each breath and each breath, lives that feeling which is not produced by algorithms nor preserved by databases. Here lies the difference between imitation and creativity, and between simulation and presence.

Today, we can listen to a song by Talal Maddah performed by artificial intelligence in the voice of Mohammed Abdu, or to a work in the voice of Talal Maddah for the songs of Mohammed Abdu, but the expert ear will quickly discover that something essential is missing; that thing is not the tone, but the way the musical phrase is constructed, the breathing points, the intensity of emotion, the ability to mold the words, and the time the artist gives to each letter before moving on to the next one.

Deepfakes have invaded art just as they have invaded politics and media, and they have become capable of producing works that seem real at first glance, but they cannot replicate the human experience that created the artist. Singing schools are not built solely on vocal ranges, but on years of accumulation, taste, culture, experience, and genuine emotion in response to the text and melody.

Therefore, the future of art will not be a battle between man and machine, but between authenticity and imitation. Technology may succeed in borrowing voices, but it fails to borrow the soul. It may replicate vibrations, but it cannot replicate the feeling that allows the listener to distinguish the artist from the very first word, even if the melody changes.

The true artist leaves a mark in every work that cannot be measured by sound frequencies, but by artistic identity. That identity will remain the most resilient mark against the chaos of artificial intelligence, as it stems from a human who lived the experience before singing it, while the machine knows only how to rearrange what has already been created by humans.