By AFP

This article was originally published on 17 Jul 202617 Jul 2026.

The law is part of a broader effort by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to promote traditional patriotism and address what supporters see as a legal double standard.

The Japanese parliament has passed a contentious law that establishes criminal penalties for desecrating the national flag.

The passage of the legislation on Friday is part of an ongoing drive by staunchly conservative Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to promote traditional patriotism and correct what her supporters call a “wrong” legal double standard.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 items

end of list

Under existing laws, Japan penalises the desecration of foreign flags to prevent diplomatic disputes, but previously lacked equivalent protections for its own flag, the Hinomaru.

The new law stipulates that anyone who publicly damages, removes, or defiles the flag in a way that causes “extreme discomfort or disgust” to others could face up to two years in prison or a fine of 200,000 yen ($1,250).

According to Japanese broadcaster Kyodo News, the law covers physical acts of vandalism such as stomping, burning, or throwing mud in public spaces, as well as livestreaming such acts.

The law drafting committee, led by former Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno, carved out highly specific legal exemptions.

The ruling party clarified that the new law completely exempts physical paintings, digital media including anime, manga, video games, and generative AI, and even the miniature paper flags famously used to decorate children’s restaurant meals.

However, opponents, including constitutional scholars and liberal politicians, argue the vaguely worded law poses a severe threat to freedom of speech as protected under Article 21 of the constitution.

The Democratic Lawyers Association of Japan strongly condemned the bill’s rationale, stating that what constitutes “discomfort” is left entirely to the “arbitrary judgment of investigative authorities,” which risks targeting political protests and government critics.

A group of 150 Japanese academics had petitioned politicians to halt the controversial bill, warning of “strong concerns that it could curb freedom of political expression”.

Highlighting the unique domestic sensitivities surrounding the Hinomaru, Ritsumeikan University law professor Takaaki Matsumiya told local publication Japan Today that “Japan has a history of waging wars of aggression, and even among the Japanese there are some people who have a negative image” of a flag that “doesn’t symbolise” democratic values in the way European flags do.

Following its World War II defeat in 1945, Japan established a US-imposed pacifist constitution, but its national flag remains unchanged.

Critics argue the law's vague language could be used to stifle dissent, particularly targeting political protests and government critics. The law's broad exemptions for digital media and art may have been an attempt to mitigate backlash, but constitutional scholars remain concerned about its impact on freedom of expression under Article 21 of the constitution. How the law is enforced will likely determine its true effect on civil liberties in Japan.