In football, not every defeat is a fall, and not every loss is the end of the story. Sometimes a team exits the tournament, but it exits bigger than it entered; more respected, more present, and more convincing that what happened was not a fleeting flash, but the beginning of a project worth building upon.

This, in my view, is what the Egyptian national team did in its recent match against Argentina. Egypt played a great match, indeed a great tournament, from the start to the final moments. They appeared organized, brave, confident, playing not with the mindset of a team waiting for a surprise, but with the mindset of a team that creates it. In five matches, they presented a different image of an Arab team capable of keeping up with the giants, not through emotional impulsiveness, but through discipline, good technical choices, and a spirit that makes the world take notice.

Fairness here requires praise for coach Hossam Hassan before the players, as the Egyptian team looked like a team that knows what it wants, not a collection of talents waiting for an individual moment. His selections were clear, his reading of many phases of the tournament was brave, and most importantly, he forged a character for the team on the field: a character that does not fear a big name, nor panic in the face of history, nor play as if it came to bow out with honor, but to compete seriously.

As for the players, they proved that the current generation possesses something greater than enthusiasm and ambition. They have the ability to challenge the strongest teams in the world and stand before a great champion like Argentina without feeling inferior or intimidated. These young men not only delivered a good match but also made a clear declaration that Egypt is capable of appearing in world tournaments not as a fleeting guest, but as a real contender if the building continues and the project is preserved from emotional reactions.

Yes, there were influential refereeing errors, and the Egyptian public has the right to be angry about them. Refereeing injustice, when it occurs, should not be buried under polite phrases. But the bigger mistake is to turn errors into a full conspiracy theory, as if the team's exit had no reason other than the world conspiring to eliminate it. This reading wrongs the team before it wrongs the referee; because it reduces a great match to anger, and reduces a promising project to victimhood.

The truth is that the Egyptian national team did not lose because it was of lesser value or presence than Argentina, but because it reached a moment that could have been managed better. Egypt delivered one of its best matches in the tournament and was for long periods the more organized side and the closer to imposing its rhythm on the game, but it ultimately collided with the experience of a team that knows how to manage decisive moments. And when Egypt took the lead, it needed an alternative plan to better manage the remainder of the match, close spaces, and maintain the advantage, while Argentina succeeded in using its long experience in such matches to turn the tables in a few minutes. This does not diminish the value of what Egypt presented, but rather confirms that the difference was not in talent or courage, but in managing the details that often decide matches among the elite.

The Egyptian team's gain was not only on the field. There was a notable massive public support around it, not only from Egyptians but from a wide Arab audience that saw in this team an image close to them and a shared dream. In many Arab cities, people cheered for Egypt as if it were playing on their behalf, and this beautiful Arab unity was one of the tournament's finest images, because it reminded us that football, in its sincere moments, can unite what politics and borders divide.

The Egyptian national team lost the qualification ticket, but it gained the world's respect. This is not a compensatory phrase for a sad audience, but a sporting reality. A team that stands before Argentina at this level and forces the world to follow it with respect does not need a conspiracy theory to prove its worth. Its value appeared on the field.

What the Egyptian national team needs today is not to dwell long on a past match, but to build on the great potential it revealed. Great experiences are not measured by a single result, but by the lessons they leave and the horizons they open for the future. If the team reads this experience well, it will not have just lost a qualification ticket, but will have laid the foundation for a more mature and prominent phase in future world tournaments.

Egypt exited the tournament, but it did not exit memory. It lost the result, but it gained something that neither a referee's whistle gives nor refereeing errors take away: the world's respect.

Quoted from 'Okaz'

Advertisement

Advertisement

Disclaimer: All published articles represent the views of their authors only.