Ahmed Al-Shamrani

Defeated Them with a Statement..!

July 20, 2026 - 00:03 | Last update July 20, 2026 - 00:03

Follow Okaz channel on WhatsApp

With every appearance of theirs, I mean those who have chosen to be part of herd culture or a choir for a single singer, I must send them back to school to learn the difference between opinion, talk, and news; and therefore they should distinguish between a categorical denial obtained by 'Okaz' and distinguished by it, and the dispute or disagreement over which is more beautiful, the song 'We Plucked the Morning Roses' or 'Sara Al-Layl Ya Bu Sharnaqa'...!

And therefore they should not expose themselves in this way, for the whole matter is a lie and we confronted it in the name of truth.

As for the threat and intimidation that 'Adnan' spoke of, it is an accusation without evidence. The matter was historical accounts that the son denied to protect his father's history. Do you consider a denial a threat?!

I keep this role for you; you were a witness who knew nothing, and that is what made me angry at you, not with you..!

I would like to know: where is the threat? And who threatened?

The person concerned spoke objectively and demanded a stop to that account because it is incorrect. Is there a threat and intimidation in this demand?

I esteemed in Prince Turki Al-Abdullah Al-Faisal his protectiveness over his father's history, and that is an inherent right to be respected.

The professionalism of 'Okaz', Adnan, you should have respected it as one of its writers, instead of belittling it to support partners of tendencies...!

I did not write an opinion or present false information for you to disagree with me; rather, I provided a series of statements through 'Okaz' to clarify the truth, and nothing but the truth.

Be assured, Adnan, that any newspaper seeking distinction would wish to obtain one statement from the statements of Prince Turki Al-Abdullah Al-Faisal published by 'Okaz'...!

As for the professionalism you keep talking about, you are the first to violate it through your direct attack on what I presented through 'Okaz' and praise of what was published in another platform, and this is unfortunately a professional flaw that must be addressed in the coming days.

You, as a group and individuals, attack Dr. Muhammad Al-Qadadi on the basis of the strike-off information. I say you attack him, not that you argue with him evidence for evidence. As for me, I have restored matters to their natural course with words that refute a narrative, and I will not abandon my role if the situation requires that...!

Finally, the next period is titled: 'You will get from me what I see from you.'